Fox News Boss Ordered Staffers To Cast Doubt On Climate Change Science

Now, finally, what you just admitted is correct, but why did you mention it in the first place, deniar?

Because you thought you could get away with it.

fiddler3: "Actually, he surveyed over 10,000 scientists­­. Only 31% responded.­"

ObjectiveR­ealist:
"Does a 31% response rate call the results into question, in your opinion? Is that opinion supported by any valid authority on the matter, ie any statistics expert?"

fiddler3:
"31% isn't the issue. Actually for a voluntary response rate with an online survey, 31% is not bad at all. The issue is the biases that are introduced because of the 'self selection' procedure.­"

You're gd right it isn't! And unless and until you provide some real evidence supporting your accusation­s ...

fiddler3: "One might question whether there is a bias in the responses due to funding sources...­"

... you're committing libel.

fiddler3:
"(a common claim made regarding skeptic claims is that they are funded by 'big oil')."

It is not a "claim" that certain prominent climate science deniars are funded by big oil and coal and when I point out that FACT I document it, like this.
http://www­.greenpeac­e.org/usa/­campaigns/­global-war­ming-and-e­nergy/poll­uterwatch/­koch-indus­tries

So your attempt at false equivalenc­e is added to the growing list of lies I've exposed you trying to tell. Care to continue? I know you're lying and I can keep proving it just as long as you can keep doing it.
About Climate Change
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost