Global Warming Measurements Don't Account For 'Missing Heat'

Say, I don't suppose that you would be willing to append to your #2:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/15/global-warming-measuremen_n_539381.html?show_comment_id=45352821#comment_45352821
OK. "Uncle"
I will believe AGW is correct if:
1 - (yada, yada)
Or...
2 - You can explain how a COMPONENT of the OLR going down when the TOTAL OLR has been going up can cause net warming.
_________________________________________________________

... something to the effect that, "considering that even Roy Spencer, whose vocation and/or avocation is the denial of global warming (not to mention evolution) has disavowed your ("my" for you :-) interpretation of OLR, therefore the **burden** is now on you (guinganbresil) to support the case that the radiative / global energy balance undermines the climate science status quo"?

Thanks in advance, for simple "yes" or for "no" with explanation.
About Climate Change
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost