Beyond "Climategeddon" - from science education to solutions

fabco: "I said the possibility of biomass relaease of ch4, as well as co2, were not being ascribed to having much potential for future net contributions of either source or sink GHG effect, by IPCC. No tie to chaos theory , at all."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rebecca-anderson/beyond-climategeddon---fr_b_555982.html?show_comment_id=47596265#comment_47596265

That is a flat-out lie. You based your case only on the assumption of a non-linear, ie chaotic region of climate system behavior. In one sub-thread, you stated

"And, working solely from memory here, I believe it is true that in the case of a two pendulum system, no external process is required to flip from one state of periodic stability to another. But rather, that anytime the system gets near enough to the unstable boundary region, it can flip states solely due to it's inherent non-linear nature that produces eddies and swirls of currents of all the attractors at the boundrarys between them."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rebecca-anderson/beyond-climategeddon---fr_b_555982.html?show_comment_id=47182728#comment_47182728
About Climate Change
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost