New Stanford Study Exposes Lack of Credibility and Expertise Among Climate Skeptics

No, you are off-topic, a violation of the terms of use:

FAQ: Comments & Moderation
Q: What is the Huffington Post's Comment Policy?
Huffington Post pre-moderates comments on our blog posts and post-moderates comments on news stories. We never censor comments based on political or ideological point of view. We only delete those comments that include the following transgressions:
• are abusive, off-topic, use excessive foul language
• include ad hominem attacks including comments that celebrate the death or illness of any person, public figure or otherwise

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/14/climategate-case-closed-n_n_537353.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-grandia/great-video-debunking-the_b_381881.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-hoggan/climate-scientist-phil-jo_b_519298.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/31/climategate-investigation_n_519644.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/01/climategate-phil-jones-uk_n_375670.html

As you can see, many discussion threads on Huffington Post have already dealt with the data stolen from University of East Anglia. In this thread, we are talking about a Stanford study of which side of the "question" of anthropogenic global warming is strongly correlated to professional achievement, and which is not. You're free to dislike, and even to try to dispute, the facts of this subject, but this is the subject of this thread.
About Climate Change
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost