If tallying the publications and citations isn't a "fair" measure of expertise and credibility then, deniars, do tell us, what is? How would YOU objectively measure expertise and credibility, if you don't like how these scientists did it?
I won't hold my breath waiting for the climate "skeptics" to admit that all they know how to do is whine and not one of them is competent to do any science. Besides, we all know already, and all knew all along, that that's the fact of this matter.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment