Monday, August 23, 2010

Global Weirding: Naming Climate Change Disasters After the Deniers

You're entitled to your opinions about how "the other side" expresses our opinions of you and your ilk just as I'm equally entitled to my opinion. That's not my point. The point is that you are not entitled to your own facts and your complaints above are absolutely not pertinent to that point.

Richard2, you are a known liar, repeatedly proven. You have been shown proof positive that your sources are garbage and that the accusations against the quality of climate science and the character of climate scientists which you parrot are utterly false but you refuse every time to admit that you're wrong, as you are every single time. You refuse even to engage in discussion of the superior, scientific sources that invalidate your claims from 'bloggers who are not peer reviewed, and many of which are anonymous.

At a certain point, what is called "common courtesy" ceases to be your entitlement. That point comes sometime after your own dishonesty shows beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are intentionally denying all of us the common courtesy of telling us the truth, and you crossed that line *long* ago. You are a waste of carbon and you have no complaint with the *manner* in which I or anybody else exposes the *fact* that you are a compulsive liar that has never contributed anything factual to any discussion of climate science or science-based environment and energy policies. Fact.
About Smarter Ideas
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

No comments:

Post a Comment