Ah, RUkidding0, that only means that TO YOU it's not about the facts.
RUkidding0: "This isn't an issue of fact."
Like it or not, you're always speaking only for yourself on this matter. I know how I reach my decisions and you know how you reach yours. About one another's motives and process, we can only infer. I do so based on how others argue the facts, how well you adhere to facts and whether you admit your errors when you're proven wrong.
So on the matter of "climategate" I have made my case, that all the accused scientists are innocent
http://www
... and that the primary accusers (Delingpole, Clive Crook, et al) knew that fact all along.
http://www
If you are able to make the case that I reached these conclusions based on faith, ie in contradiction of facts, then proceed. And if 250 words are not enough, then
http://set
Comments are screened, but your spelling and grammar appear adequate in this forum. Keep that up, and refer to original documents and not op-eds, and you should be just fine.
May the best man win.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment