Beyond "Climategeddon" - from science education to solutions

"Waste of time" is a harsh choice of phrase but it's not inaccurate.

You must agree that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Hopefully, you can also recognize that overturning the most crucial prediction of the consensus of 97% of actively publishing professionals -- that human emissions of CO₂ are causing warming *and* will continue to do so for as long as we keep emitting large amounts of greenhouse gases *within* time scales of interest for public policy -- is a most extraordinary claim that you're making.

Copying-and-pasting from wikipedia.org is certainly not extraordinary, nor is anything short of peer-reviewed research which *explicitly* supports your assertion, meaning stating it outright in the Abstract.
About Climate Change
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost