I, and many of you, have had fun wise-cracking that Greenspan knew less than he believed he knew, but for sake of discussion, let's suppose he knew *exactly* what he was doing.
----------
"We run the risk, by laying out the pros and cons of a particular argument, of inducing people to join in on the debate, and in this regard it is possible to lose control of a process that only we fully understand," Greenspan said, according to the transcripts of a March 2004 meeting.
----------
$64 Trillion Question:
Assuming they did have full "control of a process that only (they) fully understand," is attempting to take over the United States via the financial system any less "treason" than attempting to achieve the same goal by military force? Why or why not?
Discuss.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment