I don't want to "bury" my reply "where nobody can see" it, so regarding your lie down thread:
"With adjustments or without, you still don't get a graph like your avatar. You'd still have to cherry pick stations that show warming, and add a fudge factor. The fudge factor came out along with the climategate emails. Your avatar is a fraud."
http://www
(1) Not one word of your reply is true. My avatar is a correct graph of *global* mean *temperatures* since 1880. Raw temperature data are known to be incorrect, in several known ways. That is why they *must* be adjusted.
(2) Your reply does not even address my question which is about how *mathematically* and *physically* you justify EVER graphing raw thermometer data which you know are incorrect and REQUIRE adjustment, for such factors as urban heat island effect, outliers, replacement with different thermometer designs which have different systematic sources of error, and changing times of day of measurements.
You KNOW that these and other factors REQUIRE adjustment to the data. Whether you knew it yesterday morning or not, you know it now because I have told you.
You now know that what appinsys does is fraudulent.
Your failure to answer what justifies omitting the required data adjustments shows that you KNOW that omitting the required data adjustments is not justifiable.
Appinsys' graphs of raw, unadjusted temperature data are fraudulent and you know it.
About Video
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment