'Climategate' Debunking Gets Less Coverage Than Original Trumped-Up Scandal (VIDEO)

Correction, you have ONE WRITER on the entire staff of the Atlantic magazine (fittingly named "Crook"!) "printing an article sharply critical of the investigations into Climategate."

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/07/climategate-and-the-big-green-lie/59709/

And we have good reason to believe that your Clive Crook has some of his ego invested in finding at least one climate scientist guilty, of something, anything. As crooks and liars are wont to do, he seems to have leaped to a lot of conclusions without much evidence (and none of it any good) and now he would rather not eat his crow. Tough luck, crook.

http://www.desmogblog.com/hard-crook-climb-down-climategate
At the time of the controversy last November, Crook wrote column after column indicting climate scientists in the court of public opinion before any inquiry into the matter could take place.

Only 13 days after the stolen emails were made public Crook had already made up his mind writing that, "the stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering."

But after three inquires into the so-called "climate gate" matter, one of them conducted by a bi-partisan UK government committee and two by academic boards, the overwhelming conclusion is that there was no wrong-doing.
About Video
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost