Global Warming Measurements Don't Account For 'Missing Heat'

Not even close.

Unlike the stolen e-mails and the defamation of the victims of that theft, nobody is *accused* of anything so the phrase "burden of proof" does not pertain. In science, what we have are **standards** for a hypothesis to be promoted to the status of Theory, and prior to that (your present challenge) to overthrow a current leading hypothesis and replace it with your own.

For that, you need to better explain previous observations **and** make better predictions. Your model, whatever it is (you have not said) cannot even be considered until you have described it and what it predicts. Finding a correlation would not satisfy the standards of science, but had you found such a correlation, what that would give you is some shred of justification for believing that the hypothetical other quantity to which you had hypothetically correlated the warming trend is hypothetically the driver of the proven warming trend.

But apparently you don't have even that.
About Climate Change
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost